In arguing against the theories of “Zeitgeist, the Movie”, I will be presenting a three-part series of posts relating to the first century Jewish culture from which Christianity was birthed. Though I will not directly counter specific points in the movie in these posts, I will establish a historical case to demonstrate that first-century monotheistic Judaism was not doctrinally influenced by the cultural worship of various pagan deities.

Introduction

The Christian faith has weathered accusations over the years that it arose either from Hellenistic pagan mystery religions or from a flexible First-Century Judaism that would allow for a dying and rising god pagan religious pattern to be introduced.[1] Quite to the contrary, first-century (also called Second-Temple) Jews were ritual and doctrinal separatists mainly due to a fear of defilement. Out of this exclusivist faith, Christianity developed as a sect of Second-Temple Judaism that equated Jesus with the one true God; the only God worthy of worship. Because of this very exclusivity, the first Christians – being Second-Temple Jews – would not have tolerated the mere insertion or adaptation of pagan religious ideas into their Judaism for the same fear of defiling the one true God. The evidence for my case can be found in an examination of ancient Judaism in its first century environment and of the admonishment of Paul in his writings; the earliest extant texts from the New Testament.

ANCIENT JUDAISM: EVIDENCE OF SEPARATISM

Scholars have overwhelmingly viewed Ancient Judaism to be a monotheistic religion; with good reason.[2] The historical and literary data establish a people who separated themselves doctrinally, ritualistically, and to an extent, socially.[3] Before looking into the details, it is noteworthy to understand that the assessment I am leveling on the monotheism of the first-century Jewish people is not entirely void of ritualistic and social variances.[4] However, at the heart of Judaism, there exists an unwavering tenet to the “one true God.”[5]

Jewish Self-Imposed Separation

First-century Judaism was inherently exclusivist; namely due to “the nature of the Jewish conception of god which compelled the rejection of all deification of creatures as pagan abominations.”[6] From the self-imposed social separation, such as ill-regard towards marriage with non-Jews[7], to the extreme Pharisaic purity ritualism[8], the Jewish culture itself fostered a rejection of intimate community with non-Jews who defiled themselves with pagan rituals to ‘false gods.’ As Robert L. Wilken, Professor of History of Christianity at the University of Virginia states, “To the outsider it appeared that Jews were exclusionistic and separatistic.”[9] Philo, a Hellenistic Jewish philosopher from antiquity, writes of those who followed the Jews out of Egypt as “an illegitimate crowd with a body of genuine citizens.”[10] In Shaye J. D. Cohen’s article for the Harvard Theological Review, “Crossing the Boundary and Becoming a Jew,” he evidences the inferior view of proselytes to the Jewish faith in various writings from antiquity: the Acts of Pilate, the Qumran scrolls and rabbinic literature, the Mishnah, and the writings of Philo, as well.[11]

Jewish Monotheism in the Scripture

The exclusivist nature of Jewish monotheism can best be demonstrated through two key passages from Scripture.[12] The first passage is the Shema’ from Deuteronomy 6:4-6: “Hear O Israel: YHWH our God, YHWH is one,’ and continues later with the command of total devotion to YHWH, the one God, ‘You shall love YHWH your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might.’ The Shema was a vital part of Jewish liturgy being recited twice daily as prescribed in the Tractate Berakoth portion of the Mishnah[13] and it is evidenced in use as early as the second century B.C.[14] The second passage is the Decalogue, in which the first two commandments forbid Israel to have or to worship any gods but YHWH.[15] “You shall have no other gods before Me. You shall not make for yourself an idol, or any likeness of what is in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the water under the earth. You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, and on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me” (Deuteronomy 5:7-9). From the Scripture, we can clearly see those who practiced Judaism were reminded daily – twice daily – of the loyalty and worship due to the one true God.

More to come….

MJ

Footnotes:

[1] Hooke, S.H., “The Emergence of Christianity from Judaism,” Volume One. Judaism and Christianity. W.O.E. Osterley, ed. New York, KTAV Publishing House: 1969. p. 279.
[2] For examples see: Hengel, Martin. Judaism and Hellenism. Eugene, Wipf and Stock Publishers: 1974. pp. 68, 77, 264-267, 313 -314.; Rainbow, Paul A. “Jewish Monotheism as the Matrix for New Testament Christology: A Review Article.” Novum Testamentum, Vol. 33, Fasc. 1. (Jan., 1991), pg.81.
[3] “In regard to Rome, however, the argument that the Jews of Rome did not interact with Roman culture has depended to a large extent on literary sources and historical data.” Snyder, Graydon F. “The Interaction of Jews with Non-Jews in Rome.” Judaism and Christianity in First-Century Rome. Karl P. Donfried, ed., Peter Richardson, ed. Grand Rapids, Eerdmans Publishing Company: 1998. pg. 74. However, Graydon goes on to say, “In order to assess cultural changes the broader, popular data of symbols and inscriptions provide a sounder basis,” which I have found, in the course of this research, to be out of line with most scholarly opinion.
[4] Ibid. See also, Weber, Max. Ancient Judaism. Glencoe, The Free Press: 1952. Weber addresses the Essenes and the variants prevalent in Essenian doctrine. Although, he denounces that these variants arose from Judaism. Also, Knox, W.L., “Pharisaism and Hellenism,” Vol. 2,. Judaism and Christianity. W.O.E. Osterley, ed. New York, KTAV Publishing House: 1969. pp.59-109.
[5] Hurtado, Larry. How on Earth Did Jesus Become a God? Historical Questions about Earliest Devotion to Jesus. Grand Rapids, Eerdmans Publishing Company: 2005. pg.133. Also, Paul A. Rainbow. “Jewish Monotheism as the Matrix for New Testament Christology: A Review Article,” Novum Testamentum, Vol. 33, Fasc. 1. (Jan., 1991), pp. 81.
[6] Weber, Ancient Judaism, pp. 412, 417.
[7] Though inter-marriage was practiced, the converted spouse was referred to as a “proselyte,” regarded as inferior to “native Jews.” See Cohen, Shaye J. D. Crossing the Boundary and Becoming a Jew. The Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 82, No. 1. (Jan., 1989), pp. 13-33.
[8] Weber. Ancient Judaism. pg. 412.
[9] Wilken, Robert L. “Judaism in Roman and Christian Society.” The Journal of Religion, Vol. 47, No. 4. (Oct., 1967), pp. 315-316.
[10] Philo. Life of Moses 1.27 Available from http://www.earlyjewishwritings.com/text/philo/book24.html. Accessed December 5, 2007.
[11] Cohen, Crossing the Boundary and Becoming a Jew, pg. 30.
[12] Bauckham, Richard. God Crucified: Monotheism and Christology in the New Testament. Grand Rapids, Eerdmans: 1998. pg.6.
[13] Available from the Internet Sacred Text Archive website at http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tbr/index.htm. Though the Mishnah dates later than the first century, it is a compendium of Jewish practices that were already in practice by the 2nd Century A.D.
[14] William Albright’s dating of the Nash Papyrus. Albright, William F. “A Biblical Fragment from the Maccabaean Age: The Nash Papyrus,” Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 56, No. 3. (Sep., 1937), p.149.
[15] Bauckham. pg. 6.

© Mary Jo Sharp 2007

5 thoughts on “Monotheistic Judaism of the First Century – Part One

  1. “Scholars have overwhelmingly viewed Ancient Judaism to be a monotheistic religion…”

    This is somewhat nit-picky, but I assume you mean something more like “second temple Judaism” here? Or Judaism after a certain date? As far as I understand it, scholars overwhelmingly think the Hebrews began at least as henotheistic, if not polytheistic.

    This leads to my second and last point: While you can certainly find all sorts of texts from the Hebrew Scriptures promoting monotheism, it is important to note that these texts were compiled and “canonized” in a monotheistic community. Furthermore, they are ripe with instances of Israel falling over and over again into idolatry, from Sinai and onward. So it seems a little misleading to suggest that ancient Israel was just monotheistic, end of story.

    Note: I have not seen “Zeitgeist, the Movie,” and so maybe my comments are misdirected. But it seems like your points stand on their own.

  2. Mr. Blanchard,

    Yes, I am specifically addressing the first-century or Second Temple Judaism in response to the theory that Christianity developed through the influence of Hellenistic Religions on Judaism.

    However, when referring to the Biblical accounts of the nation of Israel, the Israelites were punished for worshipping other gods; even if the offending Hebrews considered those other ‘gods’ subordinate to the “Most High God.” So, even if they struggled with henotheism, the Old Testament texts (the core doctrines of Israel’s faith structure) never document henotheism as allowable.

    Thanks,
    MJ

  3. I agree that the Biblical texts almost entirely indicate monotheism – this is well-explained by their being compiled and redacted by monotheists. But it still remains that even they contain evidence that polytheism was present in Israel frequently even at the highest levels of government. Furthermore, a henotheistic past can be inferred from the language of the Biblical texts, which frequently includes statements of Yahweh’s superiority over Shemesh and other regional gods.

  4. Mr. Blanchard,

    It is true that there are instances in the Biblical texts of some Hebrews practicing something other than monotheistic worship of Yahweh, but this is always described as idol worship and as being divergent from the mainstream Hebrew culture.

    I agree with you that most scholars insist that the earliest Hebrews practiced at least henotheism if not polytheism. However, there are also scholars who believe that the evidence leans heavily in favor of monotheism. To name a few, these include B.B. Warfield, William Albright, and G.E. Wright.

    The assertion that the Hebrews were something other than monotheists is not well-supported by the available evidence, and is based on the presumptions that (1) all religion is an evolutionary development, and (2) that monotheism is a more highly evolved form of religion than polytheism. When these two presumptions are held as necessarily true, then it becomes necessary to argue that the early Hebrews could not have been monotheists. However, if these presumptions are rejected, no such assertion is required or warranted.

    While it could be true that monotheistic Jews selectively canonized their ancient writings in a manner intended to promote their own views, we cannot logically draw conclusions regarding the possible content of hypothetical writings which may or may not have existed and been discarded.

    Further, I would suggest that the principle of embarrassment adds credibility to the biblical accounts. If the Jews selectively chose the scriptures to present their people and their practices in the best light, they didn’t do a very good job! The scriptures are ripe with stories of the failures of the Hebrew people and their leaders, including forays into idol worship.

    Considering the absence of evidence to the contrary, it’s best to accept the Hebrews’ own account of their history.

  5. MJ:

    I notice that you have entered what I presume to be a part of your thesis on Monotheism in the first century, and its roots. Tell me, did you happen to read any of the works of Edwin Yamauchi? He did some very good works on this. I’ve not been able to do the research to know if he was the definitive work, but I know it is specialized in this area.

    Glenn Smith

Comments are closed.