“The Tomb of Jesus” and the Resurrection

“The Tomb of Jesus” and the Resurrection

From the Discovery Channel “Tomb of Jesus” webpage:

Ascension: It is also a matter of Christian faith that after his resurrection, Jesus ascended to heaven. Some Christians believe that this was a spiritual ascension, i.e., his mortal remains were left behind. Other Christians believe that he ascended with his body to heaven. If Jesus’ mortal remains have been found, this would contradict the idea of a physical ascension but not the idea of a spiritual ascension. The latter is consistent with Christian theology.”

The whole article is no longer available although this summary from wikipedia is helpful.

I will focus on the statement, “the latter is consistent with Christian theology.” This statement is not consistent with the writings of Paul in 1 Corinthians 15 and therefore not acceptable within orthodox Christianity. In selections from 1 Corinthians 15: 35-50 we read:

“But someone will ask, ‘How are the dead raised? With what kind of body (Greek word “soma”) do they come?’ You foolish man! What you sow does not come to life unless it dies. And what you sow is not the body (soma) which is to be, but a bare kernel, perhaps of wheat or some grain. But God gives it a body as he has chosen, and to each kind of seed its own body (soma).”

Picking back up in verse 42: “So it is with the resurrection of the dead. What is sown is perishable, what is raised is imperishable. . . . It is sown a physical body (soma), it is raised a spiritual (Greek word “pneumatikos”) body (soma). . . . I tell you this, brethren, flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable.”

The word “body” in the Greek is “soma,” which refers to a physical object (the body of both men or animals and that which casts a shadow as distinguished from the shadow itself). The word “spiritual” in the Greek is “pneumatikos” which refers to the human spirit or rational soul.

Spiritual Body – In verse 44, the scripture says “it [the body] is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body.” But what does this mean? The type of body is “relating to the human spirit, or rational soul, as part of a man which is akin to God” that is also “the body of both men and animals or that which casts a shadow.” Soma pneumatikos.

The doctrine of bodily resurrection is vital to the Christian faith. If God did not raise Jesus from the dead, giving His stamp of approval on Jesus’ message, then Christianity is false. Also, according to Christian theology, the physical resurrection of Christ was a victory over death and hope for a new life to come. Without a bodily resurrection, Christ has no victory over death. Christians are “found to be false witnesses about God, for we have testified about God that he raised Christ from the dead,” (1 Corinthians 15:15) and if Christ has not been raised, our beliefs are futile and we are still dead in our sins. (15:17)

MJ

You may access the Greek word definitions at www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?search=4983&version=nas&type=str&submit=Find using a Greek Lexicon. “Body” is Strong’s number 4983 and “spiritual” is Strong’s number 4152.

Some other good sources:
http://www.serioustimes.com/ James Emery White’s website

“The Jesus Dynasty: How to explain away the New Testament” by Darrell Bock
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2006/mayweb-only/120-32.0.html

© Mary Jo Sharp 2007

Evidence or Speculation?

Evidence or Speculation?

Recently, the book entitled “The Jesus Family Tomb” was released in bookstores, in addition the Discovery Channel aired a documentary on the same information called “The Lost Tomb of Jesus” on March 4, 2007. It was directed by Simcha Jacovici and produced by James Cameron, in order to argue that they may have found the bones of Jesus of Nazareth. The documentary pertained to ossuaries, which are burial boxes that were found in Jerusalem in 1980. Out of the ten ossuaries that were discovered, three they claim to be Jesus of Nazareth, Mary Magdalene and Judah son of Jesus. Although, they have produced a well developed film, is there really any evidence to their claim or is it pure speculation?

The suggested theory rests on the foundation that “Mariamene e Mara” is claimed to be Mary Magdalene and DNA testing supposedly proves that the ossuaries of Jesus, son of Joseph and Mariamene are not mother and son, but instead they imply that they are husband and wife. It is true that Jacovici, did do DNA testing on the small samples from the boxes of Mariamene and Jesus, Son of Joseph, HOWEVER, it was Mitochondrial DNA. This can only prove evidence regarding a mother and son relationship, not a father and daughter relationship. Therefore, this does not give any evidence to “Jesus, son of Joseph” and “Mariamene” being husband and wife. Read what Dr. James R. White wrote in his findings, “Will the book honestly discuss the limitations of mitochondrial DNA? Will they admit that such analysis can only speak to maternal relations, not to paternal relations? Will they tell us what Dr. Carney Matheson has confirmed that such a test cannot rule out that Jesus, son of Joseph was the father of Mariamne? Or will they spin the results? The answer was: spin, spin, spin. Look at this direct quote from the conclusion, page 207: “However, they were able to extract mitochondrial DNA from both the Jesus and Mariamne ossuaries. This allowed them to confirm that these were indeed Middle Eastern people of antiquity and that they were not related.” This is simply false. In an e-mail dated 2/26/07 Dr. Matheson frankly stated, “This can only identify maternal relationship of which the two remains do not share.”[1]

In addition, Mariamene is stated to be Mary Magdelen. She “has been associated with the woman in the city who was a sinner (Luke 7:37), who washed Jesus feet, but there is no scriptural basis for this. She is also associated with the woman whom Jesus saved from stoning after she had been taken in adultery (John 8:1-11) – again an association with no evidence.”[2] Jacovici makes the bold statement that she is the same Mariamene in a Gnostic gospel called the “Acts of Philip” (read it here ) however, there is NO evidence in this piece either. Once again, it is all pure speculation in the eyes of a journalist.

This is not so in the eyes of the witnesses that interacted with Jesus Christ, after His resurrection. “A great variety of persons testified that they had seen Jesus alive. He was seen on several different occasions and in various locations.”[3] Jesus the Christ “appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. After that He appeared to more than five hundred brethren at one time” (1 Cor. 15:5-6).

Speculation is the cornerstone for the movie The Lost Tomb of Jesus, but evidence reported from eyewitnesses is only one element at the foundation for the risen Lord Jesus Christ. Do you want to build on speculation or evidence?

“And Jesus said to them, why are you troubled, and why do doubts arise in your hearts” See My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself; touch Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have. And when He had said this, He showed them His hands and His feet. (Luke 24:38-40)”

Deanna

(1) White, James Dr., http://www.aomin.org/
(2) Lockyer, Herbert Sr., Nelson’s Illustrated Bible, Thomas Nelson, Nashville, TN,Thomas Nelson, 1986.
(3) Erickson, Millard, Christian Theology Second Edition, Grand Rapids, MI, Baker Academic,1998.